I’ll tell you what it’s good for: boring your audience. I put down another book today, and it saddened me. I had started taking an interest in the plot because the approach was unique. Once I was intrigued by the initial main characters, the plot took another turn.
New characters were gathering in the face of war against a dark force. I shuddered in remembrance of Tolkien’s epic battle at Helm’s Deep. What he did was well done, to be certain, but it seems I relive that battle over and over again in so many fantasy books. Unless done right, engaging war in book is a bad idea. I’ll tell you why it disengaged me. This may sound something like a rant, so I apologize...but not really.
1. Cliches. My eyes bleed upon the description of bright armor, colorful surcoats, and unrestrained bravado from flat characters. I don’t need a paragraph-long description of what these people are wearing if they’ll be dead in a page or two. What’s more, if these characters are fodder, I will not come to care about them in the next few pages as they are slaughtered. Oh, and the typical war-lingo will cause me to roll my bleeding eyes. The same old lines, the same old tactics...why should I waste my time?
2. Too Many People. Again, I have no reason to care for the victims of war. Unless I’ve been following a few specific characters for a length of the book, I have no reason to care about reinforcements coming, the fall of the flag, or the bloody stains upon the weaponry. I have yet to find war engaging because it is on such a grand scale. I can read about the most horrific death to befall someone on the battlefield, and all I gain is another yawn. Solution: follow a few specific characters, and get into their heads. Be realistic with their emotions, if they’re scared, how they view the battlefield. Connect the reader by making it personal and taking a perspective.
3. No Purpose to the Action. People die in war, and unless there is a new and interesting way to portray this, I see no point in describing your typical battlefield. I swear, there must be some unwritten code writers feel they must follow: if you have war in your book, you must describe all action that takes place. Why? Because if you don’t, I won’t understand that there’s fighting going on? Again, keep me with those main characters and give me their struggles—even if they’re not in the heat of the battle. Every scene should have a purpose, and every scene should be significant. If I can’t tell you why the scene was important, it doesn’t need to be there.
I know I’m a picky reader, but there are elements in a book that really rub me the wrong way. (That was a clichéd expression, by the way). War is one of those elements. It’s right up there with book covers portraying the hero beefed up on steroids, half-naked, tangling with some fearsome beast of fantastical origin. But that’s another rant for another day.
-Stefanie
New characters were gathering in the face of war against a dark force. I shuddered in remembrance of Tolkien’s epic battle at Helm’s Deep. What he did was well done, to be certain, but it seems I relive that battle over and over again in so many fantasy books. Unless done right, engaging war in book is a bad idea. I’ll tell you why it disengaged me. This may sound something like a rant, so I apologize...but not really.
1. Cliches. My eyes bleed upon the description of bright armor, colorful surcoats, and unrestrained bravado from flat characters. I don’t need a paragraph-long description of what these people are wearing if they’ll be dead in a page or two. What’s more, if these characters are fodder, I will not come to care about them in the next few pages as they are slaughtered. Oh, and the typical war-lingo will cause me to roll my bleeding eyes. The same old lines, the same old tactics...why should I waste my time?
2. Too Many People. Again, I have no reason to care for the victims of war. Unless I’ve been following a few specific characters for a length of the book, I have no reason to care about reinforcements coming, the fall of the flag, or the bloody stains upon the weaponry. I have yet to find war engaging because it is on such a grand scale. I can read about the most horrific death to befall someone on the battlefield, and all I gain is another yawn. Solution: follow a few specific characters, and get into their heads. Be realistic with their emotions, if they’re scared, how they view the battlefield. Connect the reader by making it personal and taking a perspective.
3. No Purpose to the Action. People die in war, and unless there is a new and interesting way to portray this, I see no point in describing your typical battlefield. I swear, there must be some unwritten code writers feel they must follow: if you have war in your book, you must describe all action that takes place. Why? Because if you don’t, I won’t understand that there’s fighting going on? Again, keep me with those main characters and give me their struggles—even if they’re not in the heat of the battle. Every scene should have a purpose, and every scene should be significant. If I can’t tell you why the scene was important, it doesn’t need to be there.
I know I’m a picky reader, but there are elements in a book that really rub me the wrong way. (That was a clichéd expression, by the way). War is one of those elements. It’s right up there with book covers portraying the hero beefed up on steroids, half-naked, tangling with some fearsome beast of fantastical origin. But that’s another rant for another day.
-Stefanie