Now that I’ve passed a major decade-mark in my life, I find myself using the expression, “back in the day…”. Those who are older than me laugh—sometimes scoff—but those who are my age share in a knowing smile just before we embark upon a rant about how things used to be. I imagine everyone goes through this at some point when they reflect upon the differences between “then” and “now.”
I consider my exposure to “then” and “now” moments a more frequent occurrence than many of my friends. I work with kids a lot. At the Metroparks, we face the growing problem of N.D.D. (Nature Deficit Disorder)—a different can of worms related to my topic. Kids who are not exposed to the outdoors suffer a range of “symptoms” from depression to obesity. At my community center, the appearance of portable video game systems literally sucked away the attention of the kids, and when game systems were taken away, the resulting fits were astounding, if not downright disturbing.
All right, now let me have my “then” moment. As a kid, I had the spectrum of indoor/outdoor activities. Outdoors, I played in the creek, caught butterflies, climbed trees, raced through fields, and made dandelion stew. Indoors, I drew pictures, listened to my radio, wrote stories (ha—you didn’t see that coming, did you?), and read books (another shocker). Yeah, there was some T.V. in there, and I do remember my very first Nintendo game system in the late 1980s. There was a balance, though, between active and sedentary, indoors and outdoors.
What has changed drastically between the “then” and the “now” is technology. No big secret there. In an effort to promote convenience and entertainment, we have developed a gambit of gadgets and diversions in the electronic fashion. You can do virtually anything with your phone, find anything on your computer, and spend hours on your better-than-life video game. You can even read a digital copy of your favorite novel on a portable reader device.
Now I don’t want to knock convenience. And any device that promotes literacy is great, but does anyone else think something is missing? I’ve tried to justify to my tech-savvy husband why I’m so bothered by portable readers. In the end, I think it’s because like everything else, they contribute to an absence of experience. (Just my opinion. Argue away, but at least hear me out).
We live in a virtual, digital world. Texting, Facebook, and other electronic means of communication seem to open doors to social avenues. I think they close just as many. When was the last time you had a REAL phone conversation—one where you talked for hours to an old friend? When was the last time you hand-wrote a letter that required a postage stamp? How about nestling down with your favorite paperback novel? Note, all these activities take time, and convenience doesn’t necessarily factor in here.
When you take the time to engage in an activity, you experience it in the fullest. When you write a letter, you need to practice good grammar. You pick your favorite pen, select some stationary. You scratch out your mistakes and try to make your cursive legible (they do still teach cursive in school, right?). All part of the experience.
Same idea with books. Pick up an old book, and you smell the yellowed paper, feel the texture between your fingers. You find the Kool-aid stains where you knocked over your glass. When your bookmark accidentally falls out, you utter some choice words before you hunt for the right page. And my favorite is flipping back to read an exciting scene at least three or four times just because it struck you in such a way.
Books are fading away. I like to think they will never be obsolete, but the truth is, we have sold more Kindle copies of Raven’s Heart by a hundred fold compared to the physical book. Publishing companies are in deep trouble. Book stores are vanishing. I used to have my choice of competing chains—at least three or four in a half-hour drive. Now I have to travel to find one. They have all closed down. Even libraries have had to adapt to become media centers (which isn’t necessarily bad, but it is a sign of change).
From an author’s vantage, I wonder how the art will survive. It was tough to be a novelist “back then”, but now when you sell a copy for $2.99 on Kindle, how do you make a living? Better keep that day job (or day jobs, as in my case). You can pay to publish your book, but again, the art form suffers from writers who do not bother to have their works edited, do not bother with grammar, and do not go the length to present a masterful creation. The bad books speak just as loudly as the good ones.
Before I digress too far in my rant, I will close with a rhetorical question. Leaving “then” behind, and looking at “now” or even “soon”, are books evolving to become a new experience in our lives, or is it an extinction of an experience and a pastime that will be remembered only by old-timers like me? I hope that like day-glo socks, G.I. Joe®, and Unchained Melody, books will return one day to be just as popular as back in the day.
-Stefanie
I consider my exposure to “then” and “now” moments a more frequent occurrence than many of my friends. I work with kids a lot. At the Metroparks, we face the growing problem of N.D.D. (Nature Deficit Disorder)—a different can of worms related to my topic. Kids who are not exposed to the outdoors suffer a range of “symptoms” from depression to obesity. At my community center, the appearance of portable video game systems literally sucked away the attention of the kids, and when game systems were taken away, the resulting fits were astounding, if not downright disturbing.
All right, now let me have my “then” moment. As a kid, I had the spectrum of indoor/outdoor activities. Outdoors, I played in the creek, caught butterflies, climbed trees, raced through fields, and made dandelion stew. Indoors, I drew pictures, listened to my radio, wrote stories (ha—you didn’t see that coming, did you?), and read books (another shocker). Yeah, there was some T.V. in there, and I do remember my very first Nintendo game system in the late 1980s. There was a balance, though, between active and sedentary, indoors and outdoors.
What has changed drastically between the “then” and the “now” is technology. No big secret there. In an effort to promote convenience and entertainment, we have developed a gambit of gadgets and diversions in the electronic fashion. You can do virtually anything with your phone, find anything on your computer, and spend hours on your better-than-life video game. You can even read a digital copy of your favorite novel on a portable reader device.
Now I don’t want to knock convenience. And any device that promotes literacy is great, but does anyone else think something is missing? I’ve tried to justify to my tech-savvy husband why I’m so bothered by portable readers. In the end, I think it’s because like everything else, they contribute to an absence of experience. (Just my opinion. Argue away, but at least hear me out).
We live in a virtual, digital world. Texting, Facebook, and other electronic means of communication seem to open doors to social avenues. I think they close just as many. When was the last time you had a REAL phone conversation—one where you talked for hours to an old friend? When was the last time you hand-wrote a letter that required a postage stamp? How about nestling down with your favorite paperback novel? Note, all these activities take time, and convenience doesn’t necessarily factor in here.
When you take the time to engage in an activity, you experience it in the fullest. When you write a letter, you need to practice good grammar. You pick your favorite pen, select some stationary. You scratch out your mistakes and try to make your cursive legible (they do still teach cursive in school, right?). All part of the experience.
Same idea with books. Pick up an old book, and you smell the yellowed paper, feel the texture between your fingers. You find the Kool-aid stains where you knocked over your glass. When your bookmark accidentally falls out, you utter some choice words before you hunt for the right page. And my favorite is flipping back to read an exciting scene at least three or four times just because it struck you in such a way.
Books are fading away. I like to think they will never be obsolete, but the truth is, we have sold more Kindle copies of Raven’s Heart by a hundred fold compared to the physical book. Publishing companies are in deep trouble. Book stores are vanishing. I used to have my choice of competing chains—at least three or four in a half-hour drive. Now I have to travel to find one. They have all closed down. Even libraries have had to adapt to become media centers (which isn’t necessarily bad, but it is a sign of change).
From an author’s vantage, I wonder how the art will survive. It was tough to be a novelist “back then”, but now when you sell a copy for $2.99 on Kindle, how do you make a living? Better keep that day job (or day jobs, as in my case). You can pay to publish your book, but again, the art form suffers from writers who do not bother to have their works edited, do not bother with grammar, and do not go the length to present a masterful creation. The bad books speak just as loudly as the good ones.
Before I digress too far in my rant, I will close with a rhetorical question. Leaving “then” behind, and looking at “now” or even “soon”, are books evolving to become a new experience in our lives, or is it an extinction of an experience and a pastime that will be remembered only by old-timers like me? I hope that like day-glo socks, G.I. Joe®, and Unchained Melody, books will return one day to be just as popular as back in the day.
-Stefanie